Connect with us


Why Jubilee will not present memo to Building Bridges team




President Uhuru Kenyatta’s Jubilee Party will not present a memorandum to the Building Bridges team.

The party has instead asked its members to individually share their opinions with the Wajir Senator Yusuf Haji-led committee.

The feeling in the party, insiders say, is that presenting a memorandum would have appeared as dictating the Building Bridges task force.

Jubilee also feels that had it presented the memorandum, the move might widen the cracks in the party.

Whereas President Uhuru Kenyatta had intimated that a referendum will be inevitable, Deputy President William Ruto’s allies have opposed the proposal.

The President, during Jamhuri Day celebrations last year, said the country must rethink its current executive structure ‘where the winner takes it all’.

There was also a concern that the party’s presentation would be misconstrued as the government’s position on the proposed changes, a source told the Star yesterday.

While a number of party members have agreed with the decision, others felt it would have been better if the party presented a position to the Building Bridges team.

North Mugirango MP Joash Nyamoko told the Star on the phone that it was wrong for the party to take such a decision without members’ input.

He said doing away with such consultations does not give justice to the issues that the Building Bridges committee is discussing with Kenyans.

The Bridges team was formed after the March 9, 2018, handshake between President Uhuru Kenyatta and Nasa leader Raila Odinga.

The 14-member committee has been collecting views from Kenyans on how to unite the country.

The issues revolve around ethnic antagonism, lack of national ethos, inclusivity, devolution, divisive elections, security, corruption, shared prosperity, and responsibility.

“From a realistic point of view, Building Bridges Initiative was a result of two large parties – Jubilee and ODM, and it would have been better if all of them presented their stand on the issues,” Nyamoko said.

He added that Kenyans who back Jubilee would be interested in the party’s thoughts on how best to end the chaos that the country experiences in every election cycle.

“The party is misguided. What BBI is handling is about the country. Jubilee has over 60 per cent representation, hence should have more say.”

But Secretary General Raphael Tuju yesterday told the Star that giving members a chance to present their views has more merits than when the party could have taken a stand.

“Our members could be having diverse views which they can now freely present to the committee.”

Nominated Senator Isaac Mwaura backed Tuju’s assertions saying members will not claim they were gagged from giving their views.

“It is the democratic right of our members to give their views to the committee. They can do so during the county visits or during a formal session with the BBI committee,” he told the Star on the phone.

The legislator supports the idea of expanding the executive and strengthening the Senate to make it ‘the real Upper House it should be’.


The committee held sittings in Laikipia yesterday as it continued to take views on the 9-point agenda of the handshake.

It has been to Kitui, Machakos, Meru, Embu, Kilifi, and Mombasa. They have also held sessions with union leaders and a number of consultants in Nairobi.

Gatundu South MP Moses Kuria, ostensibly privy to the Jubilee Party’s plan, presented his memorandum to the Bridges team last Friday.

He wants the executive arm of government expanded to include a Prime Minister, two deputy Prime Ministers, the President, and Deputy President.

In the radical proposal, Kuria also wants the position of nominated Senators and MCAs scrapped and that Senators be county assembly speakers.

An ODM committee led by executive director Oduor Ong’wen had proposed a three-tier government structure based on a parliamentary system.

In the proposal, the party wants a Prime Minister appointed by the majority party and a president elected by the people.

The party proposed the creation of 14 regional blocs instead of the current 47 county governments.

However, a source told Star that the party’s Central Management Committee almost shot down the three-tier proposal.

The dissidents were implored upon to give it a chance given that Raila had been in the forefront agitating for the same.

The committee also proposed the reduction of the size of the current national assembly from 349 MPs to 180.

Of the 180, the party will consider a proposal that 120 be elected and the remaining 60 to join Parliament through proportional representation.

The party’s committee further proposed the scrapping of the current 12 nominated MPs.

There was, however, no proposal to reduce the number of MCAs but sought that Senate is composed of 29 members and the same empowered as the Upper House.

According to the proposal, each of the 14 regions will elect two senators -male and female, the Speaker shall be the 29th member.

On the Parliamentary system, ODM is studying the France, South Africa, and Tanzania models.

The Orange party has also proposed that the 45 per cent allocation to devolved units divided so that 13.5 percent goes to regions, 26.5 percent to counties and five percent to the Ward Development Fund.

The party has created a team comprising Minority leader John Mbadi, Senate Minority leader James Orengo, and National Assembly Minority Whip Junet Mohammed to fine-tune its proposal to the Building Bridges task force.

They have up to three weeks to present a final document before the CMC chaired by Raila.

In an earlier interview, Martin Kimani – one of the secretaries of the BBI, told the Star they are optimistic of completing the task within the set deadline.

The committee, as stated in a gazette notice establishing the same, is expected to finish its work by end of June.

He said the task force has already received proposals from organisations, institutions, and individuals.

Kimani said they wouldn’t want to rush the hearings as the process’ objective is to get as many views as possible. “We are focused to meet the deadline.”



Sordid tale of the bank ‘that would bribe God’




Bank of Credit and Commerce International. August 1991. [File, Standard]

“This bank would bribe God.” These words of a former employee of the disgraced Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) sum up one of the most rotten global financial institutions.
BCCI pitched itself as a top bank for the Third World, but its spectacular collapse would reveal a web of transnational corruption and a playground for dictators, drug lords and terrorists.
It was one of the largest banks cutting across 69 countries and its aftermath would cause despair to innocent depositors, including Kenyans.
BCCI, which had $20 billion (Sh2.1 trillion in today’s exchange rate) assets globally, was revealed to have lost more than its entire capital.
The bank was founded in 1972 by the crafty Pakistani banker Agha Hasan Abedi.
He was loved in his homeland for his charitable acts but would go on to break every rule known to God and man.
In 1991, the Bank of England (BoE) froze its assets, citing large-scale fraud running for several years. This would see the bank cease operations in multiple countries. The Luxembourg-based BCCI was 77 per cent owned by the Gulf Emirate of Abu Dhabi.  
BoE investigations had unearthed laundering of drugs money, terrorism financing and the bank boasted of having high-profile customers such as Panama’s former strongman Manual Noriega as customers.
The Standard, quoting “highly placed” sources reported that Abu Dhabi ruler Sheikh Zayed Sultan would act as guarantor to protect the savings of Kenyan depositors.
The bank had five branches countrywide and panic had gripped depositors on the state of their money.
Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) would then move to appoint a manager to oversee the operations of the BCCI operations in Kenya.
It sent statements assuring depositors that their money was safe.
The Standard reported that the Sheikh would be approaching the Kenyan and other regional subsidiaries of the bank to urge them to maintain operations and assure them of his personal support.
It was said that contact between CBK and Abu Dhabi was “likely.”
This came as the British Ambassador to the UAE Graham Burton implored the gulf state to help compensate Britons, and the Indian government also took similar steps.
The collapse of BCCI was, however, not expect to badly hit the Kenyan banking system. This was during the sleazy 1990s when Kenya’s banking system was badly tested. It was the era of high graft and “political banks,” where the institutions fraudulently lent to firms belonging or connected to politicians, who were sometimes also shareholders.
And even though the impact was expected to be minimal, it was projected that a significant number of depositors would transfer funds from Asian and Arab banks to other local institutions.
“Confidence in Arab banking has taken a serious knock,” the “highly placed” source told The Standard.
BCCI didn’t go down without a fight. It accused the British government of a conspiracy to bring down the Pakistani-run bank.  The Sheikh was said to be furious and would later engage in a protracted legal battle with the British.
“It looks to us like a Western plot to eliminate a successful Muslim-run Third World Bank. We know that it often acted unethically. But that is no excuse for putting it out of business, especially as the Sultan of Abu Dhabi had agreed to a restructuring plan,” said a spokesperson for British Asians.
A CBK statement signed by then-Deputy Governor Wanjohi Murithi said it was keenly monitoring affairs of the mother bank and would go to lengths to protect Kenyan depositors.
“In this respect, the CBK has sought and obtained the assurance of the branch’s management that the interests of depositors are not put at risk by the difficulties facing the parent company and that the bank will meet any withdrawal instructions by depositors in the normal course of business,” said Mr Murithi.
CBK added that it had maintained surveillance of the local branch and was satisfied with its solvency and liquidity.
This was meant to stop Kenyans from making panic withdrawals.
For instance, armed policemen would be deployed at the bank’s Nairobi branch on Koinange Street after the bank had announced it would shut its Kenyan operations.
In Britain, thousands of businesses owned by British Asians were on the verge of financial ruin following the closure of BCCI.
Their firms held almost half of the 120,000 bank accounts registered with BCCI in Britain. 
The African Development Bank was also not spared from this mess, with the bulk of its funds deposited and BCCI and stood to lose every coin.
Criminal culture
In Britain, local authorities from Scotland to the Channel Islands are said to have lost over £100 million (Sh15.2 billion in today’s exchange rate).
The biggest puzzle remained how BCCI was allowed by BoE and other monetary regulation authorities globally to reach such levels of fraudulence.
This was despite the bank being under tight watch owing to the conviction of some of its executives on narcotics laundering charges in the US.
Coast politician, the late Shariff Nassir, would claim that five primary schools in Mombasa lost nearly Sh1 million and appealed to then Education Minister George Saitoti to help recover the savings. Then BoE Governor Robin Leigh-Pemberton condemned it as so deeply immersed in fraud that rescue or recovery – at least in Britain – was out of the question.
“The culture of the bank is criminal,” he said. The bank was revealed to have targeted the Third World and had created several “institutional devices” to promote its operations in developing countries.
These included the Third World Foundation for Social and Economic Studies, a British-registered charity.
“It allowed it to cultivate high-level contacts among international statesmen,” reported The Observer, a British newspaper.
BCCI also arranged an annual Third World lecture and a Third World prize endowment fund of about $10 million (Sh1 billion in today’s exchange rate).
Winners of the annual prize had included Nelson Mandela (1985), sir Bob Geldof (1986) and Archbishop Desmond Tutu (1989).
[email protected]    


Monitor water pumps remotely via your phone

Tracking and monitoring motor vehicles is not new to Kenyans. Competition to install affordable tracking devices is fierce but essential for fleet managers who receive reports online and track vehicles from the comfort of their desk.

Continue Reading


Agricultural Development Corporation Chief Accountant Gerald Karuga on the Spot Over Fraud –




Gerald Karuga, the acting chief accountant at the Agricultural Development Corporation (ADC), is on the spot over fraud in land dealings.

ADC was established in 1965 through an Act of Parliament Cap 346 to facilitate the land transfer programme from European settlers to locals after Kenya gained independence.

Karuga is under fire for allegedly aiding a former powerful permanent secretary in the KANU era Benjamin Kipkulei to deprive ADC beneficiaries of their land in Naivasha.

Kahawa Tungu understands that the aggrieved parties continue to protest the injustice and are now asking the Ethics and Anti-corruption Commission (EACC) and the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) to probe Karuga.

A source who spoke to Weekly Citizen publication revealed that Managing Director Mohammed Dulle is also involved in the mess at ADC.

Read: Ministry of Agriculture Apologizes After Sending Out Tweets Portraying the President in bad light

Dulle is accused of sidelining a section of staffers in the parastatal.

The sources at ADC intimated that Karuga has been placed strategically at ADC to safeguard interests of many people who acquired the corporations’ land as “donations” from former President Daniel Arap Moi.

Despite working at ADC for many years Karuga has never been transferred, a trend that has raised eyebrows.

“Karuga has worked here for more than 30 years and unlike other senior officers in other parastatals who are transferred after promotion or moved to different ministries, for him, he has stuck here for all these years and we highly suspect that he is aiding people who were dished out with big chunks of land belonging to the corporation in different parts of the country,” said the source.

In the case of Karuga safeguarding Kipkulei’s interests, workers at the parastatals and the victims who claim to have lost their land in Naivasha revealed that during the Moi regime some senior officials used dubious means to register people as beneficiaries of land without their knowledge and later on colluded with rogue land officials at the Ministry of Lands to acquire title deeds in their names instead of those of the benefactors.

Read Also: Galana Kulalu Irrigation Scheme To Undergo Viability Test Before Being Privatised


“We have information that Karuga has benefitted much from Kipkulei through helping him and this can be proved by the fact that since the matter of the Naivasha land began, he has been seen changing and buying high-end vehicles that many people of his rank in government can’t afford to buy or maintain,” the source added.

“He is even building a big apartment for rent in Ruiru town.”

The wealthy officer is valued at over Sh1.5 billion in prime properties and real estate.

Last month, more than 100 squatters caused scenes in Naivasha after raiding a private firm owned by Kipkulei.

The squatters, who claimed to have lived on the land for more than 40 years, were protesting take over of the land by a private developer who had allegedly bought the land from the former PS.

They pulled down a three-kilometre fence that the private developed had erected.

The squatters claimed that the former PS had not informed them that he had sold the land and that the developer was spraying harmful chemicals on the grass affecting their livestock and homes built on a section of the land.

Read Also: DP Ruto Wants NCPB And Other Agricultural Bodies Merged For Efficiency

Naivasha Deputy County Commissioner Kisilu Mutua later issued a statement warning the squatters against encroaching on Kipkuleir’s land.

“They are illegally invading private land. We shall not allow the rule of the jungle to take root,” warned Mutua.

Meanwhile, a parliamentary committee recently demanded to know identities of 10 faceless people who grabbed 30,350 acres of land belonging to the parastatal, exposing the rot at the corporation.

ADC Chairman Nick Salat, who doubles up as the KANU party Secretary-General, denied knowledge of the individuals and has asked DCI to probe the matter.

Email your news TIPS to [email protected] or WhatsApp +254708677607. You can also find us on Telegram through

Continue Reading


William Ruto eyes Raila Odinga Nyanza backyard




Deputy President William Ruto will next month take his ‘hustler nation’ campaigns to his main rival, ODM leader Raila Odinga’s Nyanza backyard, in an escalation of the 2022 General Election competition.

Acrimonious fall-out

Development agenda

Won’t bear fruit

Continue Reading


Kenyan Tribune