Connect with us


Study: Farmers use ‘busaa’ to treat foot and mouth disease




More by this Author


More by this Author

Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) is a highly communicable viral disease of hooved animals such as cattle, sheep, goats, pigs as well wild animals such as buffaloes. It has seven serological types O, A, C, Asia 1 and South African Territories (SAT) 1, 2 and 3.

Five of the seven types (O, A, C, SAT 1 & 2) are reported from time to time making the disease situation in the country to be termed as endemic (prevalent), unlike other places of the world where it has been eradicated.

The disease has a high morbidity (infection/spread) rate but low mortality (death). It is spread through direct contact with infected animals and materials such as fodder and vehicles; through breathing of infected aerosols; milk; semen and ingestion of meat from infected animals.

It is characterised by high fever, loss of appetite, salivation, limping, oral wounds and death in young animals. In endemic areas, biannual vaccination against the prevalent serotypes coupled with livestock movement control and enhancement of biosecurity measures can effectively control the disease.

Asked to describe foot and mouth disease (FMD) in their own words, farmers who were sampled in a last month’s survey in Nakuru noted that the disease is extremely dangerous; destructive; challenging to treat; kills in days and requires to be vaccinated against.

Some said it should be declared a national disaster and others called it ‘Ebola of cattle’.


The survey was conducted by the Nakuru Regional Veterinary Investigation Laboratory (RVIL) in collaboration with the county veterinary staff.

Its general objective was to determine the socio-economic impact of the outbreak that had affected 10 of the 11 sub-counties in Nakuru.

Of the outbreak, four of the seven common serotypes of the disease had been confirmed. These are Types O, A, SAT 1 & SAT 2.

Further, the disease that commonly affects cattle had also affected sheep, goats and pigs and there were unconfirmed cases of a dead donkey and an animal health service provider, who had developed some foot lesions after attending to some sick cows.

Interestingly, the disease usually occurs in the dry season of January to March when there is a lot of animal migration in search of water and pasture, but in this case, the disease occurred from July and up to the time of survey (October), it was still active.

Foot and mouth disease kills mostly young animals but in this case, some farmers reported high death rates in adult animals. Scientists expect results of the research will help the country deal with the disease.

Four farmers (household heads – HHH) were sampled in each of the 10 sub-counties in Nakuru that had confirmed the disease.

Two of the farmers had reported the disease since July and two had not. The survey targeted the small (1-10) and medium (11-100) dairy cattle farmers (household heads).

All (100 per cent) of female-headed households recorded the disease and was more prevalent where the farmer was aged between 36-60 years than in cases where they were youth (19-35) years or where they were over 60 years.

The active age of a person in Kenya is 36-60, that is between youth and retirement. Those involved in farming at this age could also be having other commitments, such as employment, business or bringing up a family, thus taking less interest in farm management.

They might forget to have their animals vaccinated or to take other necessary precautions such as having foot and wheel baths (disinfection sites at the farm’s entrance).

On the other hand, the youth (19-35) who take up farming are serious with it as they see it as a business. They are likely to take all disease control measures as well as management issues such as feeding and breeding seriously. Those over 60 are most likely retirees.

In the study, female-headed households recorded high prevalence of the disease and this is because, generally, women depend on their male partners for farm management. They may also lack collateral in the form of title deeds, thus cannot get farm development financial support.

The disease incidence was the highest where the farmer also engaged in white-collar employment, followed by households where the head was farming and also in business. The incidence was lowest where the head was solely and fully engaged in farming.

Generally, the other engagements limit the HHH concentration on farming, even though those engaged in business are more flexible than the employed staff, who have to get permission from a third party and hence higher disease prevalence on their farms.

The disease was reported by some households that owned sheep and goats but no farmer who owned beef cattle, donkeys or pigs reported it.

Farmers who kept farm records not only on vaccination but also other aspects such as production/sales, deaths/births plus diseases/treatments reported lower incidence of FMD than those who kept no records.

There was a higher incidence (77 per cent) of FMD where farmers practised zero-grazing than those who semi zero-grazed, did paddocking or free ranged.

A majority of the farmers (65 per cent) reported the disease outbreak to a private animal health service provider as opposed to a government veterinary staff.

Upon receiving the news, a majority (85 per cent) of the service providers (private and public) treated the animals. It was also noted that 15 per cent of the farmers whose animals had the disease had vaccinated them.


A man herds cattle in a field in Kisumu.

A man herds cattle in a field in Kisumu. Spread of foot and mouth disease is partly blamed on uncontrolled migration of livestock. FILE PHOTO | NATION MEDIA GROUP

According to the survey, a majority of the farmers whose animals were affected by the disease drenched them with local brew (busaa) as the treatment of choice.

Busaa is about 4 per cent alcohol, a concentration which is very mild as compared to surgical spirit, which is 70 per cent alcohol, so its medical value in killing the FMD virus is questionable.

The brew normally makes the animal drunk, thus reducing the pain in the foot and mouth wounds. The animal is therefore able to feed, thus boosting its immunity and recovery, but farmers should seek proper treatment.


A word of caution, however, is that the brew is stable for one to two days after production. Thereafter, acidification and denaturing take place, making the substance toxic.

Some farmers buy busaa that lasts for over five days, which implies that they could be poisoning the animals unintentionally and this explains the deaths that were occurring in adults, a rare condition as FMD is known to kill mostly young animals.

Epidemiological (disease spread) issues

Farmers who reported incidence of FMD predisposing factors such as bringing in new animals, fodder, visiting or being visited by another FMD active HHH, and or being visited by an animal health service provider a week before the outbreak reported higher incidence of the disease than those who had no such encounter.

A majority of the farmers did not have biosecurity measures such as foot and wheel baths. However, even those with the facilities who had a footbath still had the disease on the farm as the facility was minimally used due to the presence of many entrances to the animal house.

HHH that were near stock routes, slaughter premises and holding grounds, used communal facilities such as grazing areas and cattle dips had higher incidence of the disease.

Interestingly, farms that were near livestock markets were not more prone to FMD than those that were far. However, HHH who had some form of interaction with livestock markets, like buying fodder, animals or a visit by a livestock trader had higher occurrence of the disease.

Farmers who vaccinated their animals twice a year had lower chances of the disease than those who vaccinated annually, or only when there was an outbreak. This also applied for irregular vaccinations.

Social impacts of the disease reported by farmers

Self-imposed or peer-imposed quarantines; upsurge of lifestyle diseases like diabetes and hypertension; not taking animals to the dip; restricted exchange of animals for dowry or assisted grazing and restriction of animals to communal grazing grounds/watering, among others.

Economic impacts reported by farmers include reduced/loss of milk; buying milk; reduced income; loss of animals; treatment expenses; time taken to care for the sick animals; loss of body condition/animal price; restricted animal movement and trade.

Most of the issues that were found to have contributed to the disease are not new, but a few require special mention:

Zero-grazing farming system is a disease control tool for tick-borne diseases, worms and others but it is not good for FMD due to FMD transmission method.

The restricted animal movement in zero-grazing units prevents animals from being taken to communal vaccination centres.

This, coupled with the false impression that the disease cannot access animals in the zero-grazing units, makes them vulnerable.

It is, therefore, recommended that vaccinators and owners of zero-grazed animals must ensure that the animals are vaccinated routinely.

This outbreak occurred when there was enough feed and water, while those near stock routes, slaughter premises and holding grounds reported more incidents of the disease.

This implies that these facilities were the source of the disease, thus livestock movement control is key in stopping FMD.

A small portion of animals vaccinated against the disease were infected and four serotypes of the disease had been confirmed.

This means there is no cross-immunity against the serotypes and an animal vaccinated against one type can get infected with another type.

Vaccinating the animals against the four common serotypes is therefore important. Animals should be vaccinated every six months as vaccine potency declines with time.

The disease kills mostly the young stock but in this case, a number of adult deaths were reported. It is suspected that the said animals could have concurrently been infected with more than one serotype.

It is, therefore, important to enhance biosecurity when there is a disease on the farm to avoid reinfection by a different zerotype.

Most farmers reported the outbreak to private AHSP. However, FMD control is the prerogative of the county AHSP.
This implies that the private AHSP should also be involved in the disease control strategies.

Most AHSP treated the animals and only one was reported to have taken a sample. It is important to take a sample whenever there is an FMD outbreak to identify the serotype. Further, the AHSP should enhance biosecurity when moving from one farm to another.

Women-headed households are vulnerable and should be given special attention during vaccination campaigns.

Magadi soda is known to kill or inactivate the virus and animals recover faster if wounds are treated with the agent than making them get drunk through the brew.

Continue Reading


Hotels target regional meetings to aid tourism sector recovery – KBC




Kenya’s tourism and hospitality industry stakeholders are targeting the East Africa Community market for meetings, incentives, conferences and exhibitions (MICE) market to jumpstart the sector badly hit by COVID-19 pandemic.

The industry targets an estimated 29 million middle class people in the region for MICE which has been clamped down as a result of social distancing measures.

Kenya Coast Tourism Working Group Chairman Hasnain Noorani said players in the sector are working on a new pricing model as existing packages seen as too expensive for the target group which forms 22.6% of the region’s employed population according to a recent report by the African Development Bank (AfDB).

We are working together with players in the local tourism and hospitality industry to develop offers that will attract regional and domestic tourists as well, as we try to help the sector recover,” said Noorani.

Get breaking news on your Mobile as-it-happens. SMS ‘NEWS’ to 20153

Noorani who also doubles as Managing Director for PrideInn Hotels said the tourism industry is confident the strategy will reap benefits before tourists from the international markets begin to arrive when Corona virus pandemic subsides globally.


At PrideInn hotels for instant, we are having continuous product innovation, favorable pricing for the domestic market products, digitization of the MICE sector and gaining the trust of travelers through prioritizing their health and campaigns to re-assure the world that Kenya is safe,” Hasnain stated.

As with the majority of COVID-19-related adaptations, it remains to be seen whether changes in the MICE segment will remain once the health threat has subsided.

A swift pivot to online platforms can virtually bridge some of the interactive gaps caused by restrictions on mass congregations, and should therefore help to soften the blow of COVID-19 on the MICE segment,” said Hasnain.

Amid global travel restrictions, social-distancing protocols and prohibitions on mass gatherings, the world’s meetings, incentives, conferences and exhibitions (MICE) segment has been forced to adapt to the pandemic, with some events shifting online and others being deferred.

Before the outbreak of the virus and the subsequent introduction of travel restrictions and social-distancing guidelines the MICE segment presented a promising growth avenue for emerging markets seeking to diversify their tourism offering.

Continue Reading


Kenyans abroad sent home Sh32bn in April – CBK




NAIROBI, Kenya, May 18- Kenyans living abroad sent home Sh32 billion (USD 299.3 million) in April 2021, a new data show.

Data by the Central Bank of Kenya reveals that the inflows represent a 43.7 percent increase from remittance sent in April 2020 and 2.9 percent rise in March 2021.


“Remittance inflows increased to USD 299.3 million in April 2021, from USD 208.2 million in April 2020, representing a 43.7 percent increase and 2.9 percent higher than the remittances in March 2021,” said CBK in its weekly bulletin.

The cumulative inflows in the 12 months to March 2021 totalled USD 3,308 million compared to USD 2,801 million in the same period in 2020, an 18.1 percent increase.

The United States continues to be the largest source of remittances into Kenya, accounting for 57.2 percent of remittances in April 2021.

Diaspora inflows have remained Kenya’s largest source of foreign exchange since 2015.

In 2020, Kenyans abroad sent home Sh341 billion defying the pandemic odds.

Continue Reading


Afreximbank Closes Record US$1.3 billion bond




African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) has announced it successfully closed a US$1.3 billion dual tenor bond issuance, the Bank’s largest-ever transaction in the international debt capital markets.

Afreximbank printed a US$600 million 5-year note at a spread of T+185bps and a US$700 million 10-year note at a spread of T+220bps, after achieving a final order book of US$4.5 billion.

The Initial Pricing Thoughts (IPTS) were announced at T+220bps area and T+250bps area for the 5-year and 10-year tranches, respectively. Backed by strong demand, the combined books peaked at US$5 billion, with a slight skew towards the 5-year tranche, seeing pricing set at T+185 bps to a re-offer yield of 2.634% and T+220bps to a re-offer yield of 3.798%, respectively. The 10-year tranche was finally priced at only a 5bps New Issue Premium (NIP), while the 5 year was priced flat to fair value.

Afreximbank Advisors

Afreximbank Advisory and Capital Markets (ACMA) acted as Sole Financial Advisors on the transaction, while Afreximbank partners in arranging the transaction were HSBC Bank plc as Sole Coordinator and Joint Lead Manager/Book Runner as well as MUFG, Emirates NBD Bank PJSC, Commerzbank and Standard Chartered Bank as Joint Lead Managers and Book Runners.


The transaction is a major milestone for Afreximbank, marking the second time that the Bank has accessed the 144A US market and is the Bank’s largest transaction in the debt capital markets to date. It fulfils a number of key objectives of the Bank’s Liability Management strategy, which include diversification of the liability book by geography, investor type and tenor as well as reducing cost of funds.

Speaking after the closing, Mr Denys Denya, Afreximbank’s Executive Vice President responsible for Treasury, said: “This landmark deal confirms continuing investor deep confidence in Afreximbank’s mission and credit story, and achieving competitive pricing for both tranches is testament to the strength of support from investors from all key financial markets across the global.  Importantly, the success of this transaction enables the Bank to continue to play a major role in the development of intra-African trade as well as trade between Africa and the rest of the world.

Prior to pricing the transaction, Afreximbank met with both new and existing investors during well-attended virtual roadshows covering the Africa, Gulf countries, Europe, Asia and USA. The Bank received overwhelmingly strong feedback, noting confidence in Afreximbank’s credit profile and strategy. Investors also complimented the Bank in helping its member countries adjust to the shocks caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, through its Pandemic Trade Impact Facility (PATIMFA).

Fitch Affirms Afreximbank’s BBB- Credit Rating

Continue Reading